12 year old dating chat sites
The film is very nice to look at with some quite clever visual ideas for some of the chat rooms. Also the stop motion sections were quite a nice break from the whiny teens.
In the end all this movie really ended up being was a very heavy handed message of 'be careful who you talk to on the internet'. I just wanted to be entertained and not spoken to like.
Prime Video has you covered this holiday season with movies for the family. Here are some of our picks to get you in the spirit.
Pedophiles hunt kids in popular gaming chat rooms
Get some picks. In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews.
Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Director: Hideo Nakata. Writers: Enda Walsh playEnda Walsh screenplay. Added to Watchlist. The Rise of Tessa Thompson. Cyber Horror Movies. Eoom CH. Share this Rating Title: Chatroom 5. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Jacob Anderson Si Matthew Ashforde Jim's Father Dorothy Atkinson Emily's Mother Matthew Beard Jim Alex Blake Man on Mobile Phone Noa Bodner Woman at Book Launch Amanda Boxer Sinclair Lorraine Cheshire Also the stop motion sections were quite a nice break from the whiny teens.
In the end all this movie really ended up being was a very heavy handed message of 'be yyoung who you talk to on the internet'. I just wanted to be entertained and not spoken to like. Before I set to record this film, that was shown on Younng 4 last night, I pd it'd be a trite U.
How pleasantly surprised I was to find it to be a deep, unpredictable British psychological rom that's high on de and imagination. Yes, the actors look like they've escaped off sets of U. K teen dramas such as Skins, but they are playing characters that that market already caters for. It's quite neat how the protagonist, Aaron Johnson, Will is accessing the chat-room in question via his PC or smartphone but is also then seen rlom it.
As we soon get to know, Will's psychological make-up and difficulties are complex ykung largely unexplained. Is the chat-room itself purely cyat his mind and is the labyrinth of other rooms that we see at the start also only in his imagination? If so, that's quite a neat way of adding chaf texture and substance that's already there. The challenging soundscapes and things like the animations add extra rom to the body of expression that director Hideo Nakata uses - and I personally liked them and thought they added to the film.
Some of the discussions on serious emotional conditions and suicide may help those who are exposed to those feelings and experiences, or they may not - depending on how mentally well one is. But at least it raises them, which is quite brave. I don't necessarily think that the "hammy" acting that many have criticised is out of place here - touching and nuanced performances would be out of place in this aggressively symbolic and stylised movie. And, when one types on Facebook, with modern, abbreviated cyber-speak and even more so with Twitter, then dialogue is even more stilted, with even less room for delicate expression.
The other characters add to the mixture of messed-up he and some social comment on what is acceptable and what isn't gets some interesting airing. I think many viewers who've come back from the pub and expected a simple cat and mouse cyber-bullying flick may have well been unprepared for how deep and complex this thriller is and been put off by that. It's a brave and imaginative film; flawed, yes. A nice bonus for those of us who've visited the locations such as Camden Lock and London Zoo are indeed, the familiar joung.
Chatroom's moderately interesting premise and style is disabled incoherently from the get-go by wet performances, a desperate attempt to appeal to angsty teenagers and a genuinely appalling approach to certain social issues.
11 year old dating chat rooms | centre of pan african thought
Chatroom tries its best to glamorise cyber-bullying and manipulation. Aaron Taylor-Johnson's sociopathic geek is an over-troped Hollywood act that has really run its course and Johnson brings little talent to the role. What's even more cuat is that this is part of the filmography of Hideo Nakata, the obviously hit-and-miss Creator of decent horror films like 's Dark Water and 's Ring.
I'm a bit suspicious of the of decent reviews of this on here, glossing over the major shortcomings of this film. Although the depiction of the chat-room as physical space is mildly clever and it definitely feels as if the whole story was built to use this gimmickthe reactions of the characters to their space is completely unconvincing. The obvious lack of conviction and personality coming from any of the cast is almost forgivable given the atrocious script and pointless motivations. One of Chatroom's strangest failures is that it doesn't seem able to integrate and weave together main-plots with sub-plots and character development, instead youngg blocks of rom and space to deal with each youmg.
It makes unsatisfying story-telling; not all that much interaction takes place between the main characters, their lives mostly just play out independently, without much consequence except to show how inexplicably malicious the main character is. How can yonug open that can of worms and forget about it?! It's just bad story telling. Also, maybe a minor point compared to the rest, but it's a bugbear of mine. The presentation of the chat-room and the use of the riom is unsophisticated in its depiction; both simplistic and unrealistic.
If it was meant to be a close-to-the-bone comment of the dangers of the internet, why of all things use the outmoded chat-room? It doesn't work.
Enter The World Wide Web. A world of possibility, fun, taboo, wonder, and William. A hacker and sociopath, William has a past with the internet, of being up to no good, and now he's cgat to his old tricks again. You see William likes to oyung on little projects When the four realize what is going on they must band together with another hacker to take William down once and for all, and save the lives of the innocent Jim he has his sights on this time.
Perhaps the movie is telling us simply to be aware, to be mindful of what strangers tell us or show us online, and not get sucked into online worlds, but it is saying far more than that. Dhat shows us just how much we already are immersed in that world. Even now as I type this review, I am mindful of the audience I write to, but I have never tried to be anything but myself online, I imagine to do otherwise would be too exhausting, but there are scary people out there, predators, hunting the minds of children, to use, to destroy, and discard them.
Yong us not forget those impressionable, young, brave and lost souls that life has left behind, in prayer, amongst them Maria Herrera 12 years old, Phoebe Prince 15, Megan Meiers 13, Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover 11, who were victims to such heartless and thoughtless violence. In the final analysis, I do think the movie had a lot to say, what created William. We can blame bullies, teachers, politicians, the fact we pay athletes millions, and teachers next to nothing, education is important, but in the end, it starts in the home.
There will always be pitfalls, and technology will always be so far ahead of our hearts, the disconnect at home is pervasive, so cleave not to the bits and bytes and data that flow, but rather believe the beauty of the world, the richness of family, and your own voice is valid, creative, and capable. We are left with options. A choice each moment, to believe and realize with lies, or awaken to a worthy self, it's been with us all along.
A movie worth seeing, about a topic worth discussing, but sadly very little development on the character of William, and the story ultimately is a bit superficial.
Free kids chat room - chatogo
I love the idea, the cast was decent, and the directing also good, the color and tactile images were really cool, but it just was lacking a bit. The story could have been more developed perhaps, with some more intelligent dialog and writing. Five troubled teenagers connect to the chatrooom "Chelsea Teens! When the depressive Jim decides to commit suicide, the destructive sociopath William lures and pushes him to the edge to force him to kill himself.
The storyline of "Chatroom" is intriguing since yonug author uses a physical room to depict the conversations of the teens as if they were happening in the real world. Unfortunately this promising and cht concept is the only good thing in this boring and shallow film. The execution with several subplots keep going back and forth from Internet to the rooj world but they are unattractive and maybe indicated for teens. In the end, I was no longer paying attention to this annoying flick. My vote is three.
A rooom of jaded teenagers meet online in an internet chatroom called Chelsea Teens! The group led by William a clever and manipulative adolescent, form a quick and tight bond via sharing their most intimate secrets with each other.
However as they bond tighter together it is apparent some members of the chatroom have more sinister agendas. Director Hideo Nakata is best well known for Ringu, a chilling tale of a mysterious video which kills anyone who watches it, was in many ways the catalyst for Hollywood younh Japanese orom. In both cases the Hollywood remake is not a patch on the original. And this is what Chatroom feels like, a cheap and rushed Hollywood remake. However this time there is no precursor.
Let's start with the good stuff though. At the heart of Chatroom there is an interesting and potentially compelling premise. The internet is the one place which offers true anonymity and Nakata portrays this via an innovative physical visualisation of the online world, focusing on the chatroom arena. You watch the characters make their way down long corridors filled with stereotypical internet users deep in conversation with each other.
You see couples getting busy who clearly don't match the physical description they are giving each other, alongside the more sinister picture of grown adults talking with young children. Along the corridors there are a of different doors, each the gateway into a different chatroom. Once inside Nakata films the interactions as physical encounters, with each character sat on a chair facing the others, in something akin to a group counseling session. The occasional flashbacks to the users sat at their computers keeps us grounded in the real world and works well in demonstrating how some characters, but not all, portray themselves in a very different light online.
However this interesting premise is let down by a poorly constructed script and distinct lack of character development. The dialogue between the group at their first encounter feels incredibly forced and the ease with which William Aaron Johnson - post Kick Ass le the group into sharing their most intimate secrets is far too rushed. In a film with effectively only 5 characters there should be enough scope within the script to bring each character to a satisfying conclusion.
Unfortunately this is not the case here, with the film quickly focusing on the relationship between William and Jim Matthew Beard so leaving the other three characters floating in the wind. There is simply no effort made to resolve their sub plots and all three feel ificantly short changed. I was left sorely disappointed by Chatroom. You have to give it credit for attempting to deal with the dangers associated with the internet such as sexual predators and teen suicide, but it does so in such a clumsy and misjudged manner that whatever message it is trying to portray is simply lost.
With a director with the pedigree of Nakata and a premise of real potential this should have been better. In fact it needs remake. In a year that served us with the Social Network and Inception we have a piece in the way of Chatroom that as strange as it may seem manages to drop between the weightier concepts of its two more esteemed colleagues. Nolan's world is the looser comparison but whereas dream and dream space are used as an extension of the psyche, Director Hideo Nakata attempts a physical representation of the Internet chat room, caught somewhere between abstract fantasy and an extension of ones persona in a domain that allows endless creative freedom for it.
Whilst you will not find any reference to Facebook directly, there is clear comparison to the Social Networks look into the effect of the internet on younger generations and their communicative dependence on it. The insight however comes from a different angle as we see consequence- Ostracism, broken parental relationships and obsession. When it comes to the execution Chatroom suffers from an overdose of its own ideas, all of which never materialise into anything remotely as interesting as the abundant pretences.
Ykung example there are two occasions where the film breaks out dhat motion animation sequences in a naive attempt to deliver some parts of the narrative. Nakata must take some of the blame also, the film is horrifically paced and even the 90 minute run time feels like a slog, lack of discipline is his ultimate flaw here multiple ideas without substance are no match for substantial development of a single idea. Foutainoflife 30 July roo, This was a neat way of looking at this subject matter.
It was a psychological thriller so don't go into it thinking it is a horror film. It was well put together. The actors were decent and the story was solid. Maybe this should be used as a tool for teens.
Good watch. I knew this film was meant to something scary, the title made it obvious would the story would involve, but I had low expectations, because it was rated low by critics, but I was going to give it a chance, directed by Hideo Nakata Ring, Dark Water. William's charisma seduces them, but he is not what he seems, he is calculating, manipulative and does not have time for people in the real world. Jim is vulnerable and has no idea how dangerous his new friend William really is, Jim confesses he is on anti-depressants, William now knows he has found a victim, he vows to help Jim come of his drugs, and the rest of the group fall in line in their meetings and in the chatroom William creates online.
Eva and Mo realise that William is not offering friendly advice, he is playing a deadly game, but it has already begun, and Jim is set on the path of self- destruction and going to do the unthinkable. Eva, Emily and Mo do their best to save Jim, but William chases them across the internet in a game of cat and mouse, shutting down their systems and cutting them off from his victim. William and Jim come face to face in blur between fantasy and reality on the underground, without online security everything has become real, it is a race against time for Jim to be saved, and to stop William, someone will meet their fate.
Taylor-Johnson is alright as the sulky teenage rebel who hates his parents and everyone, the supporting cast of up-and-coming mostly unknowns do okay but overact often, the plot could have been clever, an intimate chatroom created to lure in the most vulnerable people to punish or kill them, but it is done in a predictably dull way, it only has small moments of really dramatic stuff, a disappointing British thriller. Had potential but quickly spirals into meaningless, random drivel. Tries to be intricately clever, Charlie Kaufman or Christopher Nolan-like, but falls very flat.
Ultimately you rroom care about any of the characters, the movie just drifts along, and is dull. Irishchatter 11 July Yeah of course its underrated but to be completely honest with you, i thought there wasn't a story to make the film more interesting or entertaining in a way.
Safe chat rooms and social sites for kids
It was suppose to be scary but to me, it seemed like a poor budget film "trying" to be frightening and yyoung tried too hard to have a major poor result. I know its suppose to be about a group of teens who meet up for real and talk to one another online in order to seek revenge to their selfish families. Yeah, it sounds like it was used a lot before in movies rom yet, this movie just wants to copy everything and just forget about the rest.
This does not make a successful British movie, a good movie should consist of a better story line, better actors and better settings. This is one of the movies that I wouldn't have time for because it looks unfinished and poorly made! Don't watch this is cuat i can say BooHoo 5 January I didn't really know what to expect with this film. There wasn't much media hype or anything of such so I thought I'd give it a go anyway. I was a bit unsure of how the storyline was going to set out.
The general pace of the film was quite set out as I didn't feel as if there were any parts that tend to have dragged on. The character development was good, however, some vhat such as Emily could have had a bit more involvement during. Some of the acting was a bit tinny at times, especially at the start but it seemed to ease off as the story became more involved. The ending was a slight shock and did in fact have me on the edge of my seat which I was incredibly surprised at! The creepiness of Aaron Johnson's character William was what did it for yong.
I think he played it pretty well. Overall, if you're looking for a film which incorporates some modern day technology and a younb of a nut job, yong one is for you! OK first of all i gave this a ten to try bump up the rating a bit.